Windhawk, the customization marketplace for Windows programs

Windhawk aims to make it easier to customize Windows programs. It allows installing and configuring mods (customization modules) with just a couple of clicks. For developers, it provides a convenient platform for developing and sharing such mods.

You can find more details, browse for the available mods and download Windhawk on the official website.

Read on for the motivation behind creating Windhawk.



As a power user, I often find the need to customize the programs I use beyond the default settings. If I’m lucky, the relevant program provides options to customize it the way I need. If that’s not the case, I have several options:

  1. Accept the lack of customization and use the program as is.
  2. Find or create an alternative program.
  3. Find or create a helper program that fills the gap.
  4. Modify the relevant program.

Of course, some annoyances are less important than others. If that’s something I encounter rarely, e.g. if I can save a couple of clicks once a week, I’ll most probably choose the first option as it’s not worth the time. If that’s a very minor annoyance, I will probably live with it too. But if that’s something I encounter regularly and it’s annoying enough, I might start looking for a solution.

Finding an alternative program might be an option, but often there’s no good alternative. Perhaps the program I’m already using is the best of its kind, but it has this little annoyance which I’d like to fix. Of course, creating an alternative program myself is often too time consuming and not feasible.

Finding or creating a helper program that fills the gap is sometimes an option. For example, AutoHotkey can be used to overcome some annoyances (e.g. it can make the target program think as if you’re holding the Shift key). Another example is the X-Mouse Button Control tool which can help customizing mouse behavior for any program. I can also create a helper program from scratch, I’ve done this on several occasions. But there are many cases in which these approaches don’t work.

If none of the above works, what I’m left with is modifying the relevant program to fix an annoyance or add new functionality.

Modifying a program

So, I have a Windows program which I’d like to modify to better fit my needs. What are my options?

If the program is open-source, the best option is to implement the improvement and contribute it to the project. This way, all users can benefit from it, including myself, and that’s where my journey happily ends. But my contribution might be rejected, e.g. because it’s very specific for my needs or for any other reason. In this case, I can choose to fork the program, but if the program is updated regularly, maintaining a fork and keeping it updated can be a hassle.

If the program is not open-source, I can modify the compiled executable of the program, usually the .exe file (as long as it’s legal, of course). That’s a more challenging task and the details are out of scope for this post. I’ll just focus on two ways to apply such a modification:

  1. Modify the .exe file on disk (also known as binary patching).
  2. Modify a running instance of the target program in memory.

Both options are valid, but modifying the file on disk has several drawbacks:

  1. If the executable file is write protected, it can’t be modified.
  2. If the executable file is digitally signed, the signature becomes invalid.
  3. Every time the executable file is updated, it needs to be patched again.
  4. If something goes wrong with the patch, there’s no easy way to revert the changes – one must be careful to create a backup before patching. And if the target program is part of the system, a bad patch might be difficult to recover from, even in safe mode.

Given the above, modifying a running instance of the target program in memory is usually a better, safer and more robust solution.

Modifying a running instance of a program in memory

There are many possible use cases for modifying a running instance of a program in memory. It can be done for a minor customization or for adding a significant missing feature. It can be required because the target program is no longer developed, because the developer refuses to add a feature or fix a bug, or for other reasons. In fact, the most popular program on this website, 7+ Taskbar Tweaker, is a great example – it adds extra features and fixes bugs in the Windows taskbar, features and bugs which Microsoft is not willing to implement or fix, and which many users find useful.

One of the challenges in implementing such a customization is that apart from the customization itself, the developer has to take care of things such as process injection, function hooking, symbol loading, creating a user interface, and more. The extra effort required for even a simple customization means that sometimes it’s not worth the effort for a developer to invest the time and improve the experience for himself and other users. At other times, the developer can take a shortcut, such as patching the file, solving the problem for himself but not having an easy way to share his work with other users.

Introducing Windhawk

Windhawk was created to make it easier for developers to implement customizations for programs. It does this by taking care of the distractions mentioned above, such as process injection, allowing the developer to focus on the customization itself. This benefits both developers and users: Developers have a simple way to create customizations (good for developers) and share them with the world (good for users).

Another benefit for users is that every mod is just a single file of textual code. This makes it easier to review what the mod really does, unlike with an executable file which is very difficult to verify. And that doesn’t come at the expense of user experience – installing a mod takes a couple of clicks, unlike compiling an open source project which requires time, programming tools, and usually some programming skills. Also, it’s easy for a user without programming skills to make minor edits to existing mods, such as changing texts or tweaking simple calculations. A mod can even be shared via a service such as Pastebin.

Example use cases

Below are examples of projects or customizations which could use Windhawk.

  • Fixing a 3+ year old bug in NVIDIA GeForce Experience. A great research by Dmirty, in which he hunts for a bug in an NVIDIA software, and finally finds a solution. For other users to use his solution, he proposes the following:
    Use a hex editor to patch NVIDIA’s binary file. Alternatively, use this PowerShell script. The PowerShell script is tailored for a specific version of the binary, and it links to another PowerShell script which attempts to patch any version using heuristic. The downsides: It might not be obvious to all users how to use a hex editor or how to run a PowerShell script, and this process has to be done after every update. The other downsides of patching a binary file apply here too. With Windhawk, Dmirty could create a mod with a similar amount of effort, making the solution easier to use and accessible to more users.

    By the way, I like the top comment to the research in Hacker News:

    “I changed this byte in the library to fix the problem” is the ultimate triumph of being in control of your device imo. If your CPU can do a thing, you can (in principle) always find out why it does that thing and make it do something else if you want. It’s just bytes all the way down.

    This is exactly what Windhawk is about – making it more accessible to gain that control over your device.

  • How I cut GTA Online loading times by 70%. Another impressive research that is worth reading. The author implemented a solution, and here are his usage instructions:

    • git clone --recurse-submodules
    • build the project with MSVC
    • inject the DLL with your favorite injector while the game is starting up

    Not that the author did something wrong – he made a quick fix for something that should have been fixed by the company a long time ago, and shared it with the world. But wouldn’t it be better if with the same amount of effort he could share his solution to all users, even those unfamiliar with terms such as Git or MSVC? Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone could install the fix in a couple of clicks?

  • Windows Timer Resolution: Megawatts Wasted. This blog post by Bruce Dawson explains how some programs increase power consumption irresponsibly, but he doesn’t suggest a solution except for the vendors to stop increasing power consumption when not needed. But what if the vendor doesn’t fix the irresponsible power consumption usage? Possible solutions are discussed in the blog post comments, and eventually Bruce says the following:

    I don’t think that a third-party solution would be practical, but I’m happy to be proven wrong. My main concern would be that any third-party modification or shimming of winmm.dll would be indistinguishable from malware.

    I’m not sure what his definition of malware is here. Perhaps what he means is that if somebody develops an easy to use solution, it will be in the form of a binary file, and it’s difficult to verify that it’s not malware. On the other hand, if the solution comes in source code form, it’s difficult to use as we’ve just seen in the previous examples. Windhawk provides the best of both worlds – allowing to share a solution in source code form which is easy to verify, and which at the same time can be installed in a couple of clicks. In fact, I’ve implemented such a mod and it’s ready to install and use: Timer Resolution Control.

  • Arranging Invisible Icons in Quadratic Time. Another fascinating blog post by Bruce Dawson about a performance bug in Windows. He reported this bug to Microsoft more than a year ago, and it still wasn’t fixed. This is yet another example in which Windhawk can be used to develop and share a solution. Maybe somebody will do that eventually.

Windhawk and 7+ Taskbar Tweaker

As mentioned earlier, 7+ Taskbar Tweaker, the taskbar customization tool for Windows, is the most popular tool among the tools you can find on this website. You might wonder what are the pros and cons of both tools, since customizations can be developed and shared in both, and how Windhawk affects the future of 7+ Taskbar Tweaker.

Regarding pros and cons, here’s a quick summary:

  • Resource usage: Both have similar resource usage when running in the background, running as a lightweight native module which is injected into the relevant process. Windhawk might use more resources when managing mods, and it also takes more disk space, but I see it as less important since it doesn’t affect the daily computer usage.
  • Stability: In both projects, stability is a very important metric for me. Both are constantly running in the background on my computer, and system stability is not affected in any way. I expect that Windhawk, being a newer project, has more bugs, but I take stability bugs very seriously and I assume most of them will be fixed as they are identified.
  • Ease of use: Both are rather easy to use and require no technical knowledge. Of course, creating mods for Windhawk requires a different set of skills, but it’s not relevant to the comparison.
  • Specialization: 7+ Taskbar Tweaker is specific to taskbar customization, while Windhawk can customize any aspect of any program.

As you can see, for a user, both solutions are quite similar as long as both provide the same customizations. Windhawk makes it easy for developers to create such customizations, and unlike with 7+ Taskbar Tweaker, anyone can contribute customizations, which means users will have more possibilities to customize their programs the way they want it.

Regarding the future of 7+ Taskbar Tweaker: It will keep existing as a separate program which supports Windows 7 to Windows 10. As mentioned in a recent blog post, most parts of the taskbar were reimplemented in Windows 11, and 7+ Taskbar Tweaker can’t be made to work with the new taskbar without a huge amount of work. My plan, at least in the short term, is to implement the most demanded customizations for Windows 11 as Windhawk mods. A couple of mods are already available, take a look. A more detailed blog post about Windows 11 taskbar customization and Windhawk will be published soon.

Looking forward

I hope that Windhawk will fulfill its vision in helping users gain control over their device. Go download Windhawk on the official website and share your experience. I’d love to hear your feedback about Windhawk, both from users and from developers.

Posted in Releases, Software by Michael (Ramen Software) on March 7th, 2022.

35 Responses to “Windhawk, the customization marketplace for Windows programs”

  1. Timothy says:

    I like this open approach for customizing Win 11 going forward. Excellent work as always! I’ll need to dig into it and see if I can contribute anything going forward.

  2. zakius says:

    personally I use AHK to add global hotkey to toggle visibility of main window of few persistent apps that are too stupid to not only have that hotkey but even to minimize to tray at all, forked an abandoned “best in class but lacking that one little thing” RSS reader (and somehow years later I am still making changes to it, oh well…), created (and later abandoned) polyfill injector in a form of extension to make usage of Waterfox Classic easier and later moved to G4 but use some dirty hacks to make some features removed in Quantum available again
    and obviously 7+TT, I use it merely for don’t group option, could live without everything else, but it’s a huge quality of life improvement

    I’ll take a look at Windhawk and may find other useful things, though apps I use generally allow me to set things up right

  3. jonathan says:

    I would have a question: is Windows 10 supported?
    I installed Windhawk 0.9.1 on W10 x64 (latest stable version), I see the tray icon, the two windhawk processes in the process manager, but I can’t show the GUI. When I click on the tray icon (or the entry in the start menu), Windows shows the UAC control, I accept, I see the “loading” cursor for ~1s, then nothing happens.
    Can I do something for helping?

    • Hi Jonathan!

      Yes, Windhawk runs on Windows 7 or newer. The GUI is a slightly modified version of VSCodium with a custom extension, so:

      • When the GUI is running, you should see it as VSCodium.exe.
      • It’s surprising that it doesn’t run at all, as the changes I did shouldn’t affect VSCodium so much that it fails to run at all.

      Let’s try the following:

      • Go to C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI, create an empty folder named data, and run VSCodium.exe as administrator. Does it run? You can remove the created folder afterwards.
      • Perhaps there are missing files because something went wrong with the installation. Try installing Windhawk again.
      • Try extracting and running the portable version. You can either uninstall the existing installation, or, to avoid uninstalling, you can run the setup with the /portable command line switch.
      • jonathan says:

        You’re right, it was a permission issue. After creating the data directory and run vscodium, it said it cannot create “user-data” and “extensions” sub-directories (
        I added permissions and now everything works.

        • it said it cannot create “user-data” and “extensions” sub-directories

          Is that while running VSCodium as administrator? Running as admin should allow writing to Program Files and its subfolders unless you customized the folder permissions.

          Also, it still doesn’t explain your fix since when you open the Windhawk UI, it uses the C:\ProgramData\Windhawk\UIData folder, not C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI\data, which is used when you run VSCodium.exe directly.

          • jonathan says:

            I ran VSCodium without admin rights. Yes, it weird 😀 I observed this:
            – create the C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI\data folder
            – run VSCodium without admin rights: permission issue, can’t create C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI\data subfolders
            – add permissions
            – run Windhawk, it works. Also, I see that C:\ProgramData\Windhawk\UIData is populated.
            – I deleted C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI\data, then restarted Windhawk. C:\ProgramData\Windhawk\UIData is used, C:\Program Files\Windhawk\UI\data doesn’t exist

            I will uninstall and delete everything, try a new install, and see if C:\ProgramData\Windhawk\UIData is populated on first run.

            • jonathan says:

              This time everything worked fine. I did a regular install. I don’t know what happened the first time.
              Maybe I tried to start the GUI to quickly? I noticed the C:\ProgramData\Windhawk subfolders took some seconds to be created (it was empty, then, 1~2s later, some subfolders were created..), and I did not start the GUI immediately.

  4. vindy says:

    Hey is there any option to add this program to the startup

    • Hi,
      If you installed the standard version, it should run at startup unless you chose not to run it at startup the last time you exited. In this case, just run Windhawk again and it will resume running at startup. If you extracted the portable version, you’ll have to make it run at startup manually, e.g. by creating a shortcut in the startup folder.

  5. Fatih says:

    Another great job from a great person. God rewards us with your presence.

  6. Robert G. Koharchik says:

    I absolutely love your work!! Been using 7tt since Windows 7. I just discovered Windhawk and it seems to be a great direction for Windows 11.

    In case these are constructive, I have a few suggestions for the beta (I bet you’re already working on some of these, anyway):

    -When not grouping applications, to have an option for new windows in the taskbar to open next to existing pins of the same application type
    -Provide an option to not display the system tray icon (this makes the functionalities feel more native and makes it less obvious a 3rd party program is being leveraged.)
    -A mod similar to edgedeflector so the widget search opens with default browser instead of Edge

  7. iamqiz says:

    very good app, thanks for your development!
    and I want to realize that open bookmarks in new tab instead of current tab in chrome/edge, but my C language skill is very low , i can’t do it🤣

    • I’m glad that you like it 🙂

      If you decide to implement the bookmarks mod, I think that it can be done by subclassing the Chrome window (you can use this mod as a reference), intercepting WM_LBUTTONDOWN/WM_LBUTTONUP and replacing them with WM_MBUTTONDOWN/WM_MBUTTONUP. That way, Chrome will get a middle click event instead of a left click event. You just need a way to know when the mouse is over the bookmarks bar. For a start, perhaps hardcoding the bookmarks bar placement is good enough.

      • iamqiz says:

        thanks for your idea , i think the difficulty is that when mouse click bookmark , it is maybe not over the bookmark bar , because i click a bookmark inside a foler 😂 ,
        is it possible that i find the chrome bookmark openning function and replace it with command which open url in new tab?
        my English is very poor 😂 forgive me if you dont understand what i mean

        • is it possible that i find the chrome bookmark openning function and replace it with command which open url in new tab?

          It’s possible but I think that it’s going to be more difficult than what I suggested. Chromium is open source, so you can try, but it’s a huge project.

          the difficulty is that when mouse click bookmark , it is maybe not over the bookmark bar , because i click a bookmark inside a foler

          You can use UI automation to find out. Similar to what Textify does, but instead of grabbing the text, you can look at properties like the type of the element under the mouse cursor.

  8. Naruto says:

    Fantastic utility, with great mod examples. Although I just began using it, I’m already thoroughly impressed and started to wonder about its potential. For example, would it be possible to create a Windows Explorer mod similar to Text Replace that would automatically replace forbidden filename characters with allowed look-alikes (e.g.: when you typed them in with Explorer.exe in focus? Hopefully the mod development will pick up and we’ll see more quality-of-life mods like that.

    • Yes, that shouldn’t be difficult. From a quick glance, the limitation is imposed by the CInputLimiter class in shell32.dll. It should be enough to hook CInputLimiter::OnChar and do the replacement. I’ll try to implement such a mod when I have some spare time.

  9. hacker1024 says:

    This is huge, and reminds me a lot of Xposed on Android.

    It’ll be great to see what kind of mods are developed as this (greatly, no doubt) increases in popularity.

    I’m excited from a development perspective as well – learning how to modify Windows apps seems significantly more complicated than what I’ve done on Android, but this project makes that process a lot more enticing for the reasons you mention.

    • Yes, Windhawk was indeed inspired by Xposed and by other projects such as Greasemonkey.

      I’m not sure how modifying Windows apps compares to Android, I’m less familiar with the latter, but it’s not that simple in Windows and requires some understanding of Windows internals. If you’d like to try yourself in mod development, you’re welcome to join the Discord channel for help and discussion.

  10. pepak says:

    Is it possible to start just the engine along with the compiled mods, rather than the full thing including GUI? VSCodium is rather resource-heavy and I don’t really need it most of the time.

    • For the portable version, you can run windhawk.exe with the -tray-only command line switch. For the standard version, that’s already the default behavior – the command line switch is used by the service to show the tray icon when a user signs in.

  11. Gus says:

    It’s a brilliant idea, and very creative. I’m sure executing requires even more creativity. And I value 7+ Taskbar, so i have an anchor application in mind.

    My concern is that windhawk will become an attractive attack surface. Hack Windhawk, and you basically can hack any program or even OS module in a PC. This invites two questions:

    What is you approach to security?
    Wouldn’t Microsoft and all security programs (Anti-virus) detect windhawk as a serious security risk and flag it or even block it somehow? Would you work with Microsoft to mitigate that?

    • Hi Gus,

      It’s a brilliant idea, and very creative.

      Thank you 🙂

      Hack Windhawk, and you basically can hack any program or even OS module in a PC.

      That’s not specific to Windhawk. Windhawk can inject code into other processes (as long as system permissions allow that), but so are other programs, it’s just that other programs don’t usually use that ability. For example, if Zoom is hacked on your system, the malicious code that takes control can inject into other programs such as the browser or OS modules. If Zoom’s update service (which is running with admin privileges) is hacked, the malicious code will have more capabilities. It’s not theoretical, it was demonstrated many times, but luckily it’s not easy to do.

      What’s unique to Windhawk is that users can try and submit malicious modules, and these modules can do harm. This is similar to downloading a malicious program or installing a malicious extension in Chrome (happened many times, too). To help mitigate that, all Windhawk mods are open source, and I verify the submitters’ GitHub/Twitter accounts, so users can decide whether they trust the code and/or the author.

      Wouldn’t Microsoft and all security programs (Anti-virus) detect windhawk as a serious security risk and flag it or even block it somehow? Would you work with Microsoft to mitigate that?

      I hope not. For now, Windhawk works on a standard Windows installation. It might not work with third-party security programs, especially if we’re talking about enterprise security solutions which are usually stricter. Unfortunately, I have no control over this and Windhawk just won’t be usable in these environments.

  12. denis says:

    Can I make Windhawk start without UAC when called from its tray icon, in the right of the taskbar. I know I can silent the UAC for all runs. For safety, I prefer to use the elevated Shortcut trick (through Windows Task Scheduler) on selected runs.

    This way I made one for Windhawk on my Desktop. It would be fun to get the same from its tray icon. This is petty compare to the great work you make for us. Hats off to you!

  13. Tony says:

    Hello, is it possible to hide the Windhawk icon from the system tray in Windows 11?
    The 7+ Taskbar Tweaker had an option for this in the settings which is neat. Thanks

  14. Dmitry Barabash says:

    Thank you for the great app!

    I have a question, if possible. Is there an ability to run Windhawk minimized? Something like 7+TT’s -hidewnd command line parameter?

Leave a Reply